Our Product Family

There is no single minimum RH that meaningfully defines performance for every installation.
Water production depends on a combination of temperature, relative humidity, humidity ratio, airflow, adsorbent characteristics, regeneration conditions, energy availability and required water output.
Bry-Air therefore recommends evaluating the actual climatic conditions of the proposed site rather than relying on a single minimum-RH figure.

Relative humidity indicates how close air is to saturation; it does not directly indicate how much water vapour the air contains.
For example, air at 40% RH can contain significantly different quantities of water vapour at different temperatures.
For AWG, temperature and moisture content must therefore be considered together, often expressed as humidity ratio or absolute moisture content.

Not necessarily.
As atmospheric moisture decreases, the amount of water available for harvesting generally decreases. However, an adsorption-based system can continue capturing moisture under lower-humidity conditions.
The actual production rate and economics depend on the complete system design and the prevailing atmospheric conditions.

Yes.
Temperature and humidity change throughout the day, affecting the amount of atmospheric moisture available for harvesting. An intelligently controlled AWG can adapt its operating cycle to changing conditions.
Water storage can also be incorporated so that production and consumption do not have to occur simultaneously.

Yes.
A meaningful assessment can consider the location, temperature and humidity profile, required water output, operating hours, available energy, water-quality requirements and the availability of solar energy or suitable waste heat.
For larger installations, site-specific climatic data provides a much stronger basis for system design than a generic nameplate capacity.

The fundamental process is different.

Both technologies have applications. Bry-Air’s objective is to provide an atmospheric water harvesting platform capable of operating across a broader range of atmospheric conditions, including relatively dry environments.

As air becomes drier, direct condensation becomes increasingly challenging. Bry-Air's proprietary adsorbent provides another route for capturing water molecules even when the water-vapour concentration is relatively low.

The actual performance depends on the adsorbent characteristics, cycle design, regeneration conditions, heat recovery and overall system efficiency.

Yes, depending on the application.
Adsorption-based systems provide an opportunity to use thermal energy for regeneration. Suitable low-grade waste heat from industrial processes, engines, generators or other sources can potentially be integrated into the regeneration process.
AWGs can also be integrated with solar PV, grid electricity, battery-backed systems and hybrid energy configurations.

Atmospheric water harvesting is fundamentally a moisture-management and heat-and-mass-transfer challenge — areas in which Bry-Air has over 6 decades of experience.
That experience includes adsorption, desiccant technology, engineered desiccant rotors, air treatment, adsorption chillers and heat and mass transfer.
AWG applies this underlying expertise to a different objective: instead of removing moisture from air and rejecting it, capture the moisture and recover it as water.

Yes, the development philosophy is different.
Bry-Air’s adsorption architecture provides a pathway to modular systems in which capacity can be increased by combining modules, rather than relying only on a single very large system.
The objective is to develop atmospheric water generation as a potential distributed water-infrastructure technology, rather than limiting it to small point-of-use appliances.

Yes. Air quality matters.
A properly engineered AWG therefore needs appropriate air-filtration and water-treatment stages, particularly in industrial, urban or polluted environments.
The final water quality depends on both the characteristics of the incoming air and the treatment system selected for the application.

Atmospheric water generally contains relatively little dissolved mineral content compared with many groundwater sources.
Depending on the intended application, the water can be further treated and, where appropriate, remineralized to achieve the desired water chemistry and taste.

Yes.
Depending on the treatment configuration and required water quality, atmospheric water can potentially be used for drinking, institutional use, industrial processes, pharmaceutical applications, laboratories, electrolysis and remote industrial operations.
The treatment system should always be designed around the final water-quality requirement.

It depends on the alternative.
Where low-cost municipal water is readily available, AWG may not be the most economical source.
The economics can change substantially where water must be transported by tanker, pumped from deep aquifers, desalinated, purified, transported over long distances or supplied through expensive infrastructure.
AWG should therefore be evaluated on a total cost-of-water and water-security basis, rather than simply compared with the tariff for conventional municipal water.

Yes, absolutely.
AWG provides an additional source of water without extracting it from aquifers. This can be particularly valuable where groundwater is depleting, saline, contaminated, difficult to access or expensive to pump.
AWG can therefore form part of a broader distributed water-security strategy.

In suitable applications, yes.
Producing water at or near the point of consumption can reduce the need for packaging, transportation and storage associated with centrally produced bottled water.
This can be particularly relevant for defense, institutions, remote facilities, hospitality and other distributed applications.

Yes.

AWG can reduce dependence on groundwater extraction, water transportation and bottled water.
However, an AWG is not automatically sustainable simply because its source is atmospheric moisture. Its environmental performance depends significantly on how much energy is required per litre and where that energy comes from.
Renewable electricity and suitable waste heat can potentially improve the overall environmental footprint.

Potential applications include defence, railways, mining, remote industry, infrastructure, hospitals, hotels, islands, disaster relief, remote communities, construction and offshore facilities.
The strongest applications are typically those where generating water locally provides meaningful value compared with transporting or otherwise sourcing it conventionally.

Yes.
Where atmospheric moisture and an appropriate energy source are available, water can potentially be generated at or close to the point of use.
This can reduce dependence on long and vulnerable water-supply chains, making AWG particularly relevant to remote, isolated and strategically important locations.

Not universally.
Different water technologies solve different water-resource problems. Desalination can be highly appropriate where seawater is abundant and very large quantities of water are required.
AWG can be attractive where seawater is unavailable, water transportation is expensive, infrastructure is limited or water is required at remote locations.
The right question is therefore not “Which technology replaces the others?” but “Which combination of technologies provides the most reliable and economical water for this location?”